RE: Calculating cumulative values - another call for h

Andrew,

Thanks, I will.  I'll also take a look at Abel's solution.

Simon

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Welch [mailto:andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: August 30, 2007 9:51 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  Calculating cumulative values - another call for help

On 8/30/07, Simon Shutter <simon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry - I should have been more clear.  Could one use something like
> count(ancestor::set) instead?

Probably not the thing to use... but its hard to suggest what to do instead
just from that sentence....

Just changing "n" to "3" is enough to make it work with your sample input -
if you're suggesting that set/@id isn't like it is in your sample and you're
having problems adapting the transform to work with your actual input then
post a more representative sample.


--
http://andrewjwelch.com