Subject: Re: Sequential numbers in pure xslt, breaking the no-side-effect rule
From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:02:06 +0100
|
Andrew Welch wrote:
Really interesting point Abel, but aren't you effectively hacking a
feature of Saxon to get the results you want,
Yes, that's why I hoped (ehrm, dreamt) that there was another way.
and only then can you
get them if you call that function without calling others in between -
for example:
<snip />
which makes the output:
1 4 7 10 13
Indeed. That's why my solution is not so nice, not cross-processor and
impossible to stabilize (i.e, the order of execution, and hence the
creation of the nodes, is unpredictable in the least).
-- Abel
| Current Thread |
Andrew Welch - 16 Mar 2007 14:56:53 -0000
- Abel Braaksma - 16 Mar 2007 15:04:13 -0000 <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
David Carlisle - 16 Mar 2007 15:07:42 -0000
Dimitre Novatchev - 16 Mar 2007 17:16:56 -0000
|
|