Re: Namespaces conventions: Why ALWAYS "http:..." tags

Play the video

Subject: Re: Namespaces conventions: Why ALWAYS "http:..." tags ?
From: "Colin Adams" <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:52:08 +0000

From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx>
Note that relative URLs are discouraged, but they are still allowed.

Depending upon your definition of allowed. XML Canonicalization does not allow them, so if you use them, your XML has no canonical form.

_________________________________________________________________ Get Hotmail, News, Sport and Entertainment from MSN on your mobile. http://www.msn.txt4content.com/

Current Thread
Namespaces conventions: Why ALWAYS "http:..." tags ? Ben Stover - 1 Feb 2007 12:23:04 -0000 <Possible follow-ups> Abel Braaksma - 1 Feb 2007 12:43:26 -0000 Michael Kay - 1 Feb 2007 12:50:21 -0000 Colin Adams - 1 Feb 2007 12:52:36 -0000 <= Mukul Gandhi - 1 Feb 2007 17:10:36 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: Namespaces conventions: W, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: Namespaces conventions: W, Mukul Gandhi
RE: Simple Question, Punnoose, Roshan	Date	Re: Simple Question, David Carlisle
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >