Re: Getting WordprocessingML p style
> Mmh, just use eq if you compare an atomic value to an other one, and > = if you test if an atomic value is equal to one of several values, > isn't it? It isn't just the cardinality rules that are different, the way comparing values of different types are handled differs as well, with = being more lenient than eq (and even more lenient in backward compatibilty mode). Generally speaking I find the = behaviour more natural, and easier to type (which is an important consideration:-) compare the stylesheet below which returns $ saxon8 -it main eq.xsl Error on line 6 of file:/c:/tmp/eq.xsl: XPTY0004: Cannot compare xs:decimal to xdt:untypedAtomic Failed to compile stylesheet. 1 error detected. change the eq to = and it returns $ saxon8 -it main eq.xsl <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>true Daviid <xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xsl:variable name="x"> <x>2</x> </xsl:variable> <xsl:template name="main"> <xsl:value-of select="2.0 eq $x"/> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet>
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format