Subject: Re: Naming conventions for xsl/xslt stylesheets
From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:53:17 +0530
|
I think technically, you can have any extension for your XSLT files
(except you should avoid using extensions used by popular softwares -
like .doc, .xls etc).
But I think it's a good practice to name pure XSLT files with .xslt
extension. .xsl extension is normally used for files having XSLT +
XSL-FO code.
(but personally, I use extension .xsl even for pure XSLT files -- as
it doesn't really matter, and I can type file names quickly).
On 1/30/07, Ben Stover <bxstover@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
just a questions concerning the naming conventions for XSLT stylesheets:
Do XSL stylesheets ALWAYS have to be in a file with filen name extension *.xsl ?
What about XSLT docs in *.xslt or even in *.xml files?
Is there a must on how to name XSLT stylesheets or only a recommendation ?
Are there differences in handling between XSLT 1.x and 2.0 versions ?
Ben
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
|