Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Reading this, I really haven't the faintest idea why there are still 
> people around there using xsltproc. Working around bugs and 
> non-compliance issues. Or, well, maybe that's it: like the experience I 
> had with XML Spy. Using it, you think "this is the way to do it". Using 
> your wrong non compliant stylesheets with a compliant processor will 
> give you errors, and you go "ah, you see? XML Spy is better! It does not 
> give me errors". Whereas you should say: "oops, I thought I coded 
> correctly, but instead, I did not. Now I can finally fix my erroneous 
> stylesheets".

I use libxslt because it's fast.

I don't think libxslt is fundamentally broken. And I'm hoping to help
bring it to xslt 2 over the next few years.

-- 
Nic Ferrier
http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk   for all your tapsell ferrier needs