bryan rasmussen wrote:

  Hi

> I think people have forgotten the explicit reference Roger
> made to schematron, since schematron is a validation
> technology that can be implemented in XSL-T it follows
> that the expression matches(flt:Aircraft/flt:Altitude,
> '[0-9]+') would give you the same capabilities as XML
> Schema datatype checking in any actually useful scenario.

  I don't think this is relevant.  It is not correct to say
"with matches(...) I can check the datatype".  I don't say
it is not correct to use matches() to check the lexical
representation of a value, in order to try to deduce some
information about its type.

  But then you have to be aware you'll not get the type,
you'll get guesses.

  Regards,

--drkm






















	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions ! 
Demandez ` ceux qui savent sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com