Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Hi Frank,
Another way you might consider doing this is by pipelining ... in the first pass, transform into your output plus warnings/errors, then pass the result into two separate processes, one that filters out the warnings and the other that filters out the content. This is a bit klugey, but doesn't take you into any extension functions at all, and it can be set up with batch files written in ancient languages if necessary. Cheers, Wendell At 07:46 AM 9/21/2006, George wrote: You can get (in general) the output of the xsl:message but you need processor specific code for that. Also this requires configuring the processor in a specific way, thus you need to have control over the transformation execution.
|
