Re: [OT] XML without Namespaces (was: Problem with em
andrew welch wrote: Hi > what XML parsers/applications will accept well-formed XML > that is not namespace-well-formed ? I don't know such application anymore. And I don't see any advantage now to have an application that deals with XML but doesn't take namespaces into accout. Even for very simple tasks. > I think I started with XML just after the namespaces rec > came became a rec, so the idea of using one without the > other just seems odd... If I remember well, in a lot of applications namespaces were not supported, then came with a bad support for namespaces, for some time after the Namespace in XML REC was adopted. But today, I'd not understand someone that would say "I'll use XML, but without the namespaces REC". Regards, --drkm p4.vert.ukl.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Aug 14 08:13:39 GMT 2006 ___________________________________________________________________________ Dicouvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Riponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expiriences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format