[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated
Subject: Re: A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated|
From: MrDemeanour <mrdemeanour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:45:28 +0100
Colin Paul Adams wrote:
"Jack" == MrDemeanour <mrdemeanour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Jack> Colin Paul Adams wrote:
"Michael" == Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In principle, you could use XSLT with a different expression
language from XPath - this just happens to be non-conformant.
Michael> It's not non-conformant if it it's done using the Michael>
Michael> <YPath:value-of select="ypath-expression"/>
extensibility features of the language:
Good point. I hope there's no demand for it though :-)
Jack> Really??? I find XSLT itself reasonably lucid; it's XPath Jack>
that I find obscure and hard-to-remember.
Really. Speaking as an implementor, I don't want to have to implement
another expression language.
As an implementor, you don't; see MK's earlier post.
But I don't find XPath obscure at all.
There ya go. No doubt my brain was incorrectly wired-up by The Implementor.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format