Re: Keeping a running total?
Hmm... I was thinking there may be some kind of hack involving sum(beginning->current factory).
Can you add to what you've said? About how would that go in terms of XSL?
On 7/10/06, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You're out of luck with for-each, because conceptually at least it processes all the factories in parallel. So you can't accumulate data as you go. Instead for this kind of problem you need recursion: to a process a list of factories, process the first factory, then process the rest of the factories by a recursive call, passing any necessary data (such as your "running total") as a parameter.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format