|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Testing for presence of alphabetical characters
> I've heard that string-length() can get expensive because of > multi-byte characters, although I would've thought translate() > sufferered from the same problem... I think few people are likely to notice the difference, but it is worth being aware that string-length() might take linear time rather than constant time because of the need to look for surrogate pairs. Of course this is very implementation-dependent. However, if you're testing the result of a translate() operation, I would think that the cost of calling string-length() is almost certainly less than the cost of calling translate(). Michael Kay
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






