[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: is arity-based "polymorphism" safe to use in xsl 2

Subject: Re: is arity-based "polymorphism" safe to use in xsl 2.0 functions?
From: Joern Nettingsmeier <nettings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:47:37 +0100
php xsl 2
Michael Kay wrote:
The spec allows you to write this because the designers thought it was
useful, so go ahead and use it.

But I prefer the version at

http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#index-of-node

whew. two thirds shorter than mine. how depressing. :-D thanks for this very instructive pointer. must've overlooked it.

btw, thanks to all the XSL gurus around here, i've learned so much during the few days that i've been reading this list!

kind regards,

jvrn


-- jvrn nettingsmeier

home://germany/45128 essen/lortzingstr. 11/
http://spunk.dnsalias.org
phone://+49/201/491621

if you are a free (as in "free speech") software developer
and you happen to be travelling near my home, drop me a line
and come round for a free (as in "free beer") beer. :-D

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.