Re: Re: XSLT Transformation .NET
maybe because it's easier to write a generic xslt for persisted datasets if they are all named the same. otherwise one would have to find a structural pattern to the tree independent of naming to order anything that came out in this way. On 12/4/05, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Didn't anyone ever mention in the > > microsoft camp there that xml elements named as field names is a bad > > idea? That it is a much more useful source if the xml elements are > > all named the same? > > Oddly, over on xml-dev people are busy complaining about formats that do > > <div class="monty"> > <span class="python"/> > </div > > rather than > > <monty><python/></monty> > > Why do you think it's bad to use field names as element names? > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format