Forgive me my confusion. I lost a link in the chain.

Thanks for your guide. I'll study that conscientiously.


Gabriel


-----Original Message-----
From: Ragulf Pickaxe [mailto:ragulf.pickaxe@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:09 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  Key problem. Ordering XML with conditions than generate
new associations.

Hi Gabriel,

On 9/28/05, Gabriel Osorio <gosorio@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> About: "RE:  Another <xsl:key> problem "
>
> My intentions are educational. :-) I'm a beginner.
>
..
> Really I do not have opinion. I used your template and did not obtain
> results, because of it I sent the xml again.
>
> Your recursion solution is elegant, but I can't understand the siblings
use.
>
Ah, I think you confuse Geert and me.
I made a scetch for Aaron, which was by no means a working solution.
Therefore it would not work without modification.

For the siblings use (and other things), I would recommend David
Pawsons FAQ: http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect2/sect21.html

Regards,
Ragulf Pickaxe :-)