Re: Strict sequential identity rule?

> How can you still call it an identity transformation, when it gives
> this behaviour?

well clearly I could, since I did:-)

I was reading what Dimitre intended not what he wrote (that's usually
best when reading my posts as well). As George just pointed out, there is
a / missing in the match.

David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________