|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: Complex Condition problem with Attributes
Subject: Re: Complex Condition problem with Attributes
From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:40:28 +0100
|

From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Complex Condition problem with Attributes
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:32:06 +0100
> It failes at the position @. But why?
you can't just put an axis (or an abreviated axis such as @) straight
after a predicate: you have to separate steps in an XPath expression
with / so its
...] / @...
not
...] @...
so
<xsl:when test="//*[contains(name(),'DebtManagement') and
(//*[contains(name(),'DebtManagement')]/@action='add' or
//*[contains(name(),'DebtManagement')]/@action='delete')">
is legal but doesn't test what you want to test.
(do you really want to use // it's very expensive operation: searching
the whole document to arbitrary depth)
"//*[contains(name(),'DebtManagement')
finds the elements you want but then (I think) you want to know if
_those_ elements have an add or delete action, but your test just
searches the entire document again (twice) finding the same eleemnts
each time.
I think you want
//*[contains(name(),'DebtManagement')[@action='add' or @action='delete']
But if you can use something other than // it is likely to be more
efficient. Or you could use a key.
David
I think you missed off a ].
//*[contains(name(),'DebtManagement')][@action='add' or @action='delete']
Joe

|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|