Re: 1.0 and 2.0 and suitability for tasks

Access to an XSLT 2.0 processor through scripting doesn't seem that
difficult to implement without any browser developer involvement.

Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev.

On 8/25/05, Manfred Staudinger <manfred.staudinger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would like to use XSLT 2.0 only. But as the client side
> processing depends on browser support, I have to split
> my application and keep the stylesheets for the browser
> at XSLT 1.0.
> Or is support for XSLT 2.0 coming soon in any browser?
>
> Regards, Manfred
>
> On 8/24/05, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > So I think the best thing we XSLTers can do for now is try 2.0 and
assess
> > > it on our own, not paying too too much attention to the marketers either
way.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Wendell
> >
> >
> > Tried.
> >
> > Assessed.
> >
> > Remarkable results produced...
> >
> > Just try to compare FXSL for XSLT 2.0  with FXSL for XSLT 1.0.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dimitre Novatchev
>
>


--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Harry did not ask how Dumbledore knew; ...but Harry had long since
learned that bangs and smoke were more often the marks of ineptitude
than expertise.