|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSL FO keep-together=int Implementation?
On Jun 12, 2005, at 6:15 AM, G. Ken Holman wrote:
That's a huge bummer... ...and what I saw when I perused the compliance of many of the XSL vendors/implementations. I believe both interpretations of keep-together="always" are allowed given this sentence in section 4.8: If not all of a set of keep conditions of equal strength can be satisfied, then some maximal satisfiable subset of conditions of that strength must be satisfied (together with all break conditions and maximal subsets of stronger keep conditions, if any). So, an implementation can choose to violate the keep-together if it can't possibly satisfy the condition (e.g. the area will fit on no page) as maximal subset of satisfiable could mean the empty set. In that sense, breaking across pages would be an acceptable solution if the content does not fit. It would be better for interoperability that always meant always. -- Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








