|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: xsl-list Digest 22 Jun 2005 05:10:01 -0000 Issue 4
On Jun 22, 2005, at 1:10 AM, xsl-list-digest-
help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:24:29 +0100 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Contexts that are atomic values Message-Id: <200506212224.XAA23479@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> That there's no current node while processing a scalar value, I understand, but why can't there be a current document?
I don't know why I didn't think of using a variable. As for 'for- each-group', I didn't know it existed at all :-) Of, course, the for- each-group approach is the best solution (once you figure out there's also a current-group() function, which is not obvious from the w3.org documentation...). Thanks a lot for your help, MC -- 2p3p[dl!d2+s!%0=@l!l^!<#]s#[s/0ds^]s@[p]s&[ddvs^3s!l#x0<&2+l.x]ds.x
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








