[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re:

Subject: RE: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: Time for an exslt for 2.0?)
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:25:37 +0100
RE:  Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re:
> To be pedantic, my:f($x) is my:f($x) should always evaluate to true()
> in the absence of errors. But that can be taken as read.

No, given

<xsl:function name="f">
  <xsl:param name="x"/>
  <a/>
</xsl:function>

then

    f($x) is f($x)

is defined to be false. Similarly, given

<xsl:variable name="x" as="element()*">
  <xsl:for-each select="1 to 5"><a/></xsl:for-each>
</xsl:variable>

then

    count($x/.) 

is defined to be 5. (The /. causes duplicates to be eliminated: this is to
demonstrate that in this case there are no duplicates).

Certain expressions - including function calls - return distinct results
each time they are evaluated.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.