OT: Shakespeare and spell checking (was Text processin

A comment I can't resist:

It's wrong to use a spell checker on Shakespeare's works, because:
A) Standardized spelling didn't exist in his time
B) He's Shakespeare and you're not

(No offense meant, of course - a comment made purely in jest)

On a more serious note, hats off to both Dimitre and Mike for FXSL and 
Saxon - excellent work.

Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)
(and founder and first President of the University of Wyoming Shakespeare 
Society)




Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
04/04/2005 04:44 PM
Please respond to
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
Re:  Text processing on XSLT 2.0






At 04:56 PM 4/4/2005, you wrote:
>Among the unknown words are such nice words as:
>
>affordeth
>affrighted
>ariseth
>arithmetician
>arrivance
>bethink
>betimes
>bewhored

... why I almost never use a spell-checker -- they never know my 
favorites!

(Seriously -- that's some pretty impressive work going on over there.)

Cheers,
Wendell



======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================