[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: following-sibling and xsl:sort

Subject: RE: following-sibling and xsl:sort
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:06:50 +0100
RE:  following-sibling and xsl:sort
> > Me too. Turing completeness is not the same as closure over 
> the data model.
> > To take an obvious example, there is no way of creating a 
> result tree that
> > contains an unparsed entity, even though the data model 
> allows unparsed
> > entities to exist.
> Closure only implies that you never create anything not in 
> the set; not 
> that you can create everything in the set.

Thanks for the correction, you're right of course. Is there a term for what
I was trying to express: "complete coverage", perhaps?

Michael Kay

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.