Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Wa
Hi Jeni, On 4/19/05, Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Dimitre, > > > What is really not elegant at all in XSLT 2.0 is the impossibility to > > define user data types inline in a stylesheet -- forcing the > > programmer to artificially separate in different files type definition > > from type usage makes XSLT 2.0 rather unique... :( > > Since the November 2004 Working Draft, you can nest a (WXS) schema > within an <xsl:import-schema> element, so you can define data types > within the stylesheet module if you want. This only applies to > Schema-Aware XSLT processors, of course. Then we have two quite different languages. Cheers, Dimitre. > > Cheers, > > Jeni > > --- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com/
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format