Re: Separating XSLT 1 and 2 help?

Right, sometimes i read solutions to problems i'll have the next day :)


On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 18:49:30 -0500, Mulberry Technologies List Owner
<xsl-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 5:09 PM -0600 3/1/05, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort wrote:
> >Now there's some common sense comment but is also taken from the point of
> >view of the others that responded - I said "specific".
> 
> I know you did. I understood your suggestion, I thought about it,
> and I disagree.  Discussions on XSL-List serve at least two functions;
> the original poster gets a question answered and other people learn
> what sorts of questions people have (and by implication, the things
> they are doing with XSL) and how the questions can be addressed.
> A list specific to XSLT 2, that addressed only questions that the
> poster knew were about XSLT 2, might serve the first function very
> well, but I think it would erode the ability of the list to serve
> the second function.
> 
> This second function, general education of people interested in
> XSL, seems be a very valuable function of XSL-List; I get messages
> from lurkers regularly who tell me how much they learn simply by
> reading the list.
> 
> -- Tommie
> --
> ======================================================================
> B. Tommie Usdin                        mailto:btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
> 17 West Jefferson Street                           Phone: 301/315-9631
> Suite 207                                    Direct Line: 301/315-9634
> Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in XML and SGML
> ======================================================================