[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a defa

Subject: Re: Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default
From: JBryant@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:39:59 -0600
dan odonnell
I've been using XSLT 2.0 and the various versions of Saxon 8 since July of 
2004. I've had very little trouble with either. Dr. Kay fixed the one bug 
I found in Saxon 8 within a day (and I had already thought of a 
work-around).

I can see two issues. First, you'll tie yourself to a single vendor. 
That's not much of an issue, since you would probably pick a single vendor 
anyway and since Saxonica is a fine vendor. Second, the 2.0 specification 
may change before it is finalized. However, that risk seems to be low, as 
the working group is winding down (so I gather anyway).

I have been solving problems for my clients without undue difficulty (and 
often much more easily than I could with XSLT 1) for 8 months now. Based 
on my experience, I recommend that you go with Saxon 8 and XSLT 2.0.

Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)




Daniel O'Donnell <daniel.odonnell@xxxxxxxx> 
03/08/2005 12:26 PM
Please respond to
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
 Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default






Hi,
                 I have a question that calls for informed opinion: is 
there a reason 
for not using xslt 2.0 for most processing tasks? I'm thinking 
especially privatish, and pre-processed things rather than on-the-fly 
commercial applications.
                 The standard is now pretty stable, correct? and the 
processors seems to 
be working well. Saxon 8b-3 is very good, and since Saxon 6.5.3 has a 
bug that seems to stop it writing properly in Service pack two XP 
machines, it may be a good time to switch anyway.
                 No doubt a trivial question, but I'd be interested in 
hearing what 
people think. I'm engaged in a couple of new project involving xslt 
where the question of 1.0 or 2.0 is real.
-dan
-- 
Daniel Paul O'Donnell, PhD
Associate Professor of English
University of Lethbridge
Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4
Tel. (403) 329-2377
Fax. (403) 382-7191
E-mail <daniel.odonnell@xxxxxxxx>
Home Page <http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/>
The Digital Medievalist Project: <http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/>

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.