RE: Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a defa
-- From: Michael Kay You've had several responses with different views on the probability of failure, but to make a decision you need to assess the other two variables, and it's unlikely that anyone but you can do that. I think we're starting to see one risk disappear, namely the risk of being locked into a single supplier. There are now three XSLT 2.0 processors released, and I'm sure we'll see others in the next few months. (I have no idea, of course, what quality they will be.) Confused Michael. Yours, Colins and .....? Whose is the third please? regards DaveP -- DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format