RE: example for xsl:output saxon:next-in-chain

> This is the kind of thing Mike means by needing to know how you are 
> invoking the transformation. 

Yes, it's partly a polite way of trying to find out if people have done
something really stupid, without asking them if they are really stupid. But
also, when people tell you the whole story, the answer leaps out at you:
"Ah, you're using the deprecated saxon:widget feature! That was never
intended to work with saxon:gadget!".

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/