Re: xsl recursion (Re: xsl transform issue)

How does this compare to xmlstarlet?

--- Emmanouil Batsis <Emmanouil.Batsis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Not the answer you are looking for but, as far as
Cocoon goes, using SAX based transformers is probably a much better way of
processing large files (or any files actually, IMHO) as the pipeline
is not interrupted by building any in-memory representations and the
stream is processed in various pipeline steps at the same time (you can
have data in the serializer while still reading in the first step, at
least in theory).

Manos


dan sherman wrote:

This does not work, I want test for the data field,
certain keys will be fall in ti the first part of

the

choose, other will fall into the otherwise part.

Maybe

someone can point me in the right direction.

Thanks,
DJ

----------xsl below-----------------
<xsl:if test="name = 'NullSessionPipes'"> <xsl:for-each select="./win-registry-data/data">
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when
test="./win-registry-data[@data] = 'netlogon'">
<td><xsl:value-of
select="./win-registry-data/data"/></td>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise>
<td ><xsl:value-of
select="./win-registry-data/data"/></td>
</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:if>


--------------xml below ----------------------

<win-registry-key><name>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanManServer\Parameters</name><exists>true</exists>

<win-registry-value><name>NullSessionPipes</name><exists>true</exists><type>REG_MULTI_SZ</type>

<win-registry-data><data>COMNAP</data></win-registry-data>

<win-registry-data><data>COMNODE</data></win-registry-data>

<win-registry-data><data>SQL\QUERY</data></win-registry-data>

<win-registry-data><data>SPOOLSS</data></win-registry-data>

<win-registry-data><data>netlogon</data></win-registry-data>

<win-registry-data><data>lsarpc</data></win-registry-data>

<win-registry-data><data>samr</data></win-registry-data>

<win-registry-data><data>browser</data></win-registry-data>

              </win-registry-value>
          </win-registry-key>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam

protection around

http://mail.yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com