|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: alternative to namespace exmaple
Dmitri,
I think you are right in suspecting that this is over-engineered -- if that's what you're suspecting. <us:item xmlns:us="www.uss.com"> <us:value>4000</us:value> </us:item> Could more easily be <item whose="us"> <value>4000</value> </item> <item whose="them"> <value>1000</value> </item> etc. Then <xsl:value-of select="format-number(sum(//us:value) - sum(//them:value), '###,###,##0.00')" /> and <xsl:value-of select="format-number(sum(//*[local-name() = 'value']), '###,###,##0.00')" /> could be <xsl:value-of select="format-number(sum(//item[@whose='us']/value) - sum(//item[@whose='them']/value), $sum-format)" /> and <xsl:value-of select="format-number(sum(//value), $sum-format)" /> (declaring $sum-format as '###,###,##0.00') Without knowing more about it, I think the application of namespaces doesn't get you much here: it merely makes things messy and complicated. (I can't, however, say what impact this would have on performance, if any, without trying it.) Things could be simplified even further if you don't actually need those <item> element wrappers (label the values themselves with their "owners"). Cheers, Wendell
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








