Re: using step or following-sibling?

Play the video

Subject: Re: using step or following-sibling?
From: Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:29:57 +0100

> unsatisfactory about that solution. It still leaves the question: is there an alternative for > position()?
What have you got against position()
It's very hard to think of answers to your question without knowing
_why_ you are trying to solve the problem only using a subset of the
language, and without knowing exactly which subset that is.
David

Don't ask me! I didn't post the question.. :-)

Look up the start of the thread to find out who...

Grtz

Current Thread
Re: using step or following-sibling?, (continued) Geert Josten - 3 Dec 2004 22:25:09 -0000 JBryant - 3 Dec 2004 22:30:20 -0000 Geert Josten - 6 Dec 2004 23:10:28 -0000 David Carlisle - 7 Dec 2004 10:17:09 -0000 Geert Josten - 7 Dec 2004 12:30:12 -0000 <= Message not available Wendell Piez - 3 Dec 2004 22:25:50 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: using step or following-s, David Carlisle	Thread	Re: using step or following-s, Wendell Piez
Is there a free multiplatafor, IceT	Date	Re: Add attributes Processed , David Carlisle
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >