RE: Test for preceding-sibling and text

Play the video

Subject: RE: Test for preceding-sibling and text
From: "Ragulf Pickaxe" <jawxml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:58:21 +0000

Hi again,

Following the discussion in the "characters in xsl" thread, I tried changing "*" with "node()" in the XPath, that is: "not(preceding-sibling::*[1][self::A])" became "not(preceding-sibling::node()[1][self::A])"

This seems to work. Will there be any reason that this should not?

Regards,
Ragulf Pickaxe :-)

_________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

Current Thread

Test for preceding-sibling and text
- Ragulf Pickaxe - 10 Nov 2004 16:04:26 -0000
  - <Possible follow-ups>
  - Andrew Welch - 10 Nov 2004 17:10:22 -0000
  - Ragulf Pickaxe - 11 Nov 2004 07:15:27 -0000
    - Geert Josten - 11 Nov 2004 21:55:15 -0000
  - Ragulf Pickaxe - 12 Nov 2004 11:59:23 -0000 <=
    - David Carlisle - 12 Nov 2004 12:08:15 -0000
  - Ragulf Pickaxe - 12 Nov 2004 13:24:24 -0000
    - David Carlisle - 12 Nov 2004 13:57:26 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Test for preceding-siblin, Geert Josten	Thread	Re: Test for preceding-siblin, David Carlisle
Re: Grouping by key, Geert Josten	Date	Re: Test for preceding-siblin, David Carlisle
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >