|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: position() test for processing boundaries
Hey Ron,
To add to what Mike says, if you don't have the option of using XPath 2.0, you could work around the difficulty he describes with xsl:copy-of by using xsl:apply-templates instead (probably with a mode), and using the templates then applied to further constrain exactly what you want to happen. Maybe you want to use xsl:copy instead of copy-of (which will do a "shallow copy" of the current node only, not a "deep copy") -- which you could do in any templates matching in the applied mode. It's nice to see all those apps and rdgs. Cheers, Wendell At 08:47 AM 11/19/2004, Mike wrote: The test is the same in both cases. The third item in .//* is the <rdg n="3"> element. The two elements before this are the <q n="1"> element and the <app n="2"> element, and you have obtained deep copies of these two elements, just as you requested. ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








