Re: xslt processors

On Friday 08 of October 2004 20:21, david_n_bertoni@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> By the way, I'm not sure how you can report that Xalan-C is 4-5
> times slower than xsltproc for the 17MB file when you killed the
> process after 5 minutes!  That doesn't make any sense at all. Can
> you elaborate more?
>

That's the problem. On small documents, XalanC is slower than 
xsltproc. On big documents, I can't compare, because xsltproc 
initialization tooks much time. So in this case, XalanC speed 
calculated from total time is better, but not sufficient for me.

-- 


Dusan Zatkovsky