Re: node-selection

Subject: Re: node-selection
From: Stefan Borchert <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:16:25 +0200

Hi!

> (//item[@active=1])[last()]

Argh, I tried this but without the surrounding brackets. But it make really sense. :-)

> /descendant::item[@active=1][last()]
> /descendant-or-self::item[@active=1][last()]

ok, think I understand it now

Thanks to all. It now works as I expect it.

greetings,

Stefan

Current Thread
Re: node-selection, (continued) Wendell Piez - Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:34:20 -0400 Geert Josten - Fri, 29 Oct 2004 21:44:23 +0200 Wendell Piez - Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:53:56 -0400 Geert Josten - Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:25:59 +0200 Stefan Borchert - Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:16:25 +0200 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: node-selection, Geert Josten	Thread	determine existence of preced, Matthew L. Avizinis
Re: calling templates dependi, Stefan Borchert	Date	Re: node-selection, Geert Josten
	Month

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3