RE: // and descendant interchangeable ?

Play the video

Subject: RE: // and descendant interchangeable ?
From: <Jarno.Elovirta@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:00:58 +0300

Hi,

> > I was under the impression that descendant:: and // are
> > exactly the same.
>
> No. "// is short for /descendant-or-self::node()/"
> <http://localhost/TR/xpath/#path-abbrev>.

That should of course be <http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath#path-abbrev>. Sorry.

Cheers,

Jarno - Madam Zu: March 2004

Current Thread
// and descendant interchangeable ? santony - 17 Sep 2004 01:56:13 -0000 <Possible follow-ups> Jarno.Elovirta - 17 Sep 2004 05:06:39 -0000 Jarno.Elovirta - 17 Sep 2004 06:05:30 -0000 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: // and descendant interch, Jarno.Elovirta	Thread	Count problem, Sebastian Fey
RE: // and descendant interch, Jarno.Elovirta	Date	RE: Exclude elements in trans, S�nke Ruempler
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >