Re: collapsing number ranges

Play the video

Subject: Re: collapsing number ranges
From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:39:35 -0400

On Aug 27, 2004, at 5:42 AM, David Carlisle wrote:

7777-7778 => 7777-78
not -8 ?

Sorry for the algorithm confusion. It was late, and I probably should have explained that the algorithms vary. So, sometimes they say that, in the above case, it ought to be collapsed to 7777-8, while in other cases 7777-78. I'm happy to just get one of them correctly working for the time being though!

I had implemented a hack that just compared the substrings, but I'll try the more general solutions posted here.

Thanks all!

Bruce

Current Thread

Re: collapsing number ranges, (continued)
- Jeni Tennison - 27 Aug 2004 09:22:31 -0000
  - J-P S - 27 Aug 2004 09:32:57 -0000
  - Bruce D'Arcus - 27 Aug 2004 13:38:30 -0000
- David Carlisle - 27 Aug 2004 09:43:03 -0000
  - Bruce D'Arcus - 27 Aug 2004 11:39:54 -0000 <=
- J-P S - 27 Aug 2004 08:47:05 -0000
  - David Carlisle - 27 Aug 2004 10:00:07 -0000
    - Bruce D'Arcus - 29 Aug 2004 03:33:10 -0000
    - Jeni Tennison - 29 Aug 2004 09:55:56 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: collapsing number ranges, David Carlisle	Thread	RE: collapsing number ranges, J-P S
RE: xslt 2, grouping and more, Michael Kay	Date	RE: xslt 2, grouping and more, David . Pawson
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >