Re: collapsing number ranges

Play the video

Subject: Re: collapsing number ranges
From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:22:47 -0400

On Aug 31, 2004, at 5:11 AM, David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I'm not sure I'd even chase such an irregular lot Bruce!
       :200-204
yet
       :101-8
and
       :321-28
Somewhat illogical?
I've always been suspicious of people recommending
the Chicago manual of style.
there's a whole bunch of reasons!

Yes, true, but then you run into a fascist copy editor at some journal publisher who insists you follow it.

I haven't even considered whether there are different algorithms for different core styles (apa, mla, etc.), which there no doubt is!

Bruce

Current Thread

Re: collapsing number ranges, (continued)
- Jarno.Elovirta - 27 Aug 2004 09:31:15 -0000
- David . Pawson - 31 Aug 2004 09:14:22 -0000
  - Bruce D'Arcus - 31 Aug 2004 09:22:59 -0000 <=
  - Michael Kay - 31 Aug 2004 10:14:39 -0000
- David . Pawson - 31 Aug 2004 10:41:12 -0000
  - Bruce D'Arcus - 31 Aug 2004 10:50:38 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: collapsing number ranges, David . Pawson	Thread	RE: collapsing number ranges, Michael Kay
Re: Replacing values, David Sinclair	Date	RE: Multiple matches against , Andrew Welch
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >