|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Performance Question: Expensive Functions in Predi
M. David Peterson wrote:
Hi Eliot, I think you may have misread my conclusion: I said that the select-based approach is the most attractive *from a code maintenance and simplicity standpoint* because it both avoids the need for a separate catch-all template required by the match-based approach and avoids the separate if statement required by the unqualified select and match approach. Your performance measurements then demonstrate that the select-based approach is *also* the highest performing, which I guess I should have been able to predict for the reasons you stated (it results in the fewest overall node tests being performed). Therefore I think we are in agreement that putting the qualification in the apply-templates processing is the overall best solution in general and that using IF within templates is clearly the worst. It also seems likely that differences in XSTL implementation optimization strategies will not significantly change the results. Cheers, E. -- W. Eliot Kimber Professional Services Innodata Isogen 9030 Research Blvd, #410 Austin, TX 78758 (512) 372-8122 eliot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.innodata-isogen.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








