Re: XHTML [WAS: Grouping into a table (for vertical a
I believe you meant the above criteria. However, even if document does not strictly comply to the above, it should be still consider XHTML (just not strictly-conformant XHTML) as long as it is well-formed HTML. As far as XPath/XSLT is concerned a namespace is just part of the name and having the wrong namespace is just the same (and has the same effects on template matching) as having the wrong local name. _You_ may consider that <x> <foo/> <bar/> </x> is XHTML, but just not "strictly conforming to the XHTML spec" but it's not clear if this is really a useful distinction. If by "XHTML but not strictly conforming" you just mean "well formed XML" why not call it "well formed XML"? David -- The LaTeX Companion http://www.awprofessional.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=0201362996 http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0201362996/202-7257897-0619804 ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format