RE: Is it possible to get " " in output rather th

> Hi Ken, thanks for this info.  Are you saying that by 
> outputting a single
> character rather than the text " " that the processor is 
> non-conformant
> (I think you're saying that section 16.2 makes this optional), or that
> getting an 0xFF byte in the stream rather than an 0xA0 is the problem?

It certainly would be non-conformant to output 0xFF here, but I suspect Ken
was jumping too quickly to blame the software. I would want to look very
carefully at how you invoked the processor - in particular, how the result
tree was serialized - and at exactly what you did to the output before
finding that 0xFF byte. 

Michael Kay