RE: standalone="no"

Play the video

Subject: RE: standalone="no"
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 16:07:16 +0100

> Should I include 'standalone' in the processing statement? I could
> generate the output without it, but I am hesitant to just "leave it
> blank". Michael Kay's book (1st edition) indicates that it should be
> included in all well formed XML documents.

Some misreading there. It is definitely optional, and as far as I can tell,
rarely used.

Michael Kay

Current Thread
RE: XSLTC, (continued) M. David Peterson - Wed, 12 May 2004 08:01:44 -0600 Mike Ferrando - Wed, 12 May 2004 07:33:45 -0700 (PDT) David Carlisle - Wed, 12 May 2004 15:49:53 +0100 M. David Peterson - Wed, 12 May 2004 08:59:43 -0600 Michael Kay - Wed, 12 May 2004 16:07:16 +0100 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: standalone="no", M. David Peterson	Thread	great problem formating the o, Dionisio Ruiz de Zar
Re: What is the best approach, Julian Voelcker	Date	Re: Concatenating multiple in, David Carlisle
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >