[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Comparing grouping techniques in terms of performa

Subject: Re: Comparing grouping techniques in terms of performance
From: Kevin Jones <kjones@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 08:40:07 +0100
Re:  Comparing grouping techniques in terms of performa
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 22:39, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort wrote:
>
> I still would like to know if there are any sites that publish
> this type of comparison - if not, I would be interested in
> setting up this myself as part of my site.
>

Hi,

There are unfortunately very few published performance 
guidelines. The best overview is probably in the FAQ at 
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect4/N9883.html. 

I think it is fairly well understood that all others things being 
equal using for-each will be quicker than template matching. The 
caveat is that the improvement is often so small as not to be 
important and template solutions are normally much cleaner. In 
this particular case (with simplified stylesheets) I measured a 
4% difference for a file with 2000 entries in favour of using 
for-each. As the document size grows so does the difference. 
This was on the Sarvega processor, other processors may be 
different.

Regards,
Kev.

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.