[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: performance and the xsl:for-each-group instruction

Subject: RE: performance and the xsl:for-each-group instruction
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:16:02 -0000
xsl for each performance
I would expect the performance to be fairly similar. Muenchian grouping is
pretty efficient, it's hard to improve very much on it. The big advantage of
xsl:for-each-group (at least with the group-by option) is usability, not
performance.

Michael Kay 

# -----Original Message-----
# From: Gruenewald, Terry [mailto:tgruenewald@xxxxxxxxxx] 
# Sent: 24 March 2004 21:00
# To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# Subject:  performance and the xsl:for-each-group instruction
# 
# Does the xsl:for-each-group instruction have a performance 
# benefit over using the Muench method, or is it just syntactic 
# candy?  I've been testing xsl:for-each-group against the 
# Muench method in Saxon 7.8 and I don't see any performance 
# gain.  It would make sense (at least to me) that 
# xsl:for-each-group could operate much more efficiently than 
# the Muench method since it knows what you want to do is group.  
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.