|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Omnimark vs. XSL (Saxon) Challenge
On 18.03.2004 (10:20 Uhr +0000), Andrew Welch wrote:
>Heres a potential solution...
[...]
>This is linear, so hopefully you can use it. Please post back any
>comments/improvements.
Andrew,
That is great. I can't even see a difference in performance between my 4 and 256 row test tables! It is always below two seconds!
I removed the code that came from my width-collecting requirement and will post the rest as a general table normalization stylesheet in a different post for easier retrieval ("Table Normalization").
Now with 2 seconds (XSL) against 32 seconds (Omnimark) it looks like a clear win.
Thanks a lot! I learned a lot, too!
- Michael
--
_____________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Ing. Michael M|ller-Hillebrand
"Mehr Effizienz f|r Wissensarbeiter" --> http://cap-studio.de
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








