Subject: Re: Re: attribute values as name value pair
From: "James A. Robinson" <jimr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:25:38 -0800
|
That'll teach me to double check things before I post! My
solution was just plain wrong (sorry, long day).
> select="count(preceding-sibling::*/@*[not(name()='trade')])"/>
Does using preceding-sibling mean that the introduction of other elements
or attributes will require adjustment of the code? I'm finding it very
hard to adjust to a no-side-effect language.
Jim
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|