Re: Debugging XSLT
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:07:01AM +0400, David Tolpin wrote: > It should not be a feature of the language; it is a debugging > facility; moreover, it is a debugging facility using information > exterior to the language to issue a message. Just as a small point of discussion, C, C++, Java, Perl, Python, Ruby, Smalltalk, Lisp, Scheme, ML, Forth, and any-other-language-you-can-name does not need to morph the language design to support debugging features. Debugging is a feature of the language implementation. If it needs to bleed through into the language design, then the debugging features are a leaky abstraction. It's all well and good that implementors decided to agree on how to debug a stylesheet transformation, and agreed to use post-validation with a schema. But that *extension* doesn't need to be part of the language design. Z. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format