Re: Getting a distinct list of node names

> > > node:definition/*[not(name() = name(preceding-sibling::*))]
> >
> >Why should this take a long time?  Isn't this the same as
> >
> >*[not(name() = name(preceding-sibling::*[last()]))]
>
> preceding-sibling::*[last()]), which therefore won't de-duplicate properly.
>
> So it won't take a long time, and it won't work either.

But is there a way to express it as a single predicate? I mean, not equal to the name
of any preceding-sibling? Just out of curiousity.

Cheers,
Wendell

======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================