|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Notes on Comparison of XSL FO Renderers
David Tolpin wrote:
Therefore, all tests will be against FO instances. Given this, I can generate some test cases myself, although I will still need to have realistic test cases contributed. Another normalization is unrolling shorthands, or not using FO files with shorthands for testing. They are not required for the basic level of conformance, and FOP does not support them. Good point. Does anyone have a process that will transform an FO instance to expand shorthands? Cheers, Eliot -- W. Eliot Kimber Innodata Isogen eliot@xxxxxxxxxx www.isogen.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








