RE: variable visibility

Play the video

Subject: RE: variable visibility
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:38:33 +0100

> 
> Well, I did not consider such (d,e,f and g) as siblings in 
> that sense as 
> they did not use the xsl namespace.
> Thanks anyway
> Ragulf Pickaxe :)

Siblings are nodes that are children of the same parent. Their names
don't come into the matter.

Michael Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: variable visibility, (continued) Michael Kay - Sun, 19 Oct 2003 02:48:40 -0400 (EDT) Ragulf Pickaxe - Mon, 20 Oct 2003 06:37:19 -0400 (EDT) Michael Kay - Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:57:09 -0400 (EDT) Ragulf Pickaxe - Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:34:11 -0400 (EDT) Michael Kay - Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:37:09 -0400 (EDT) <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: variable visibility, Ragulf Pickaxe	Thread	XSL-FO Property Resolution / , Stefan Hermann
Re: Generating an Xpath expre, Jeff Kenton	Date	RE: Immediately preceding-sib, Michael Kay
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >